Demondwarf
My feedback
7 results found
-
52 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Confused you are as i have made mention in countless threads its for the smaller crews who have no chance against the big crew battles, yes that affects our crew and your crew and all others, but No 1 crew ranking is not my game i really don't care.
But there Mr 1 arm goes again you are not hearing what you want to hear , and frankly i am also done we leave it as it is and everyone can suffer period and that includes you
Thanks too all for your comments
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Comment taken @cookycustard i also never said stop double day, quite the opposite, what i am saying it will stop/ become half of what we see via default. Those players who spend real money for CPs to have bomb floors on double will stop spending the amount they do as of now and may even stop completely. I for 1 who actually does not spend any money on CPs and provides a double day floor will stop, as again its my opinion that i will not see the reason for it, as i couldn't careless about the status. My bomb floor with bee is around 300 bombs that the community as a whole will lose in terms of items gained.
The comment around global yes that is for another discussion, as well as the constant badgering by players that hold grudges against each other. Quite frankly Cas are just titles that earn monthly citizenship for doing..... nothing and that is the reason the game is where it is. Dramatics should be left for Broadway and lets enjoy the game immaterial of things we might feel is not right.
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Amazing comments but yes ok i agree with you rob in that vein so there u have it , i wanted that to be a different discussion , but ok cool its here so here goes , bombs and how much real money 1 can spend should not be part of XPs gained towards crew ranking, that's a given. I believe that James looks at the suggestion topic at hand not something added on, that yes in this case may be paramount to the same thing. What is so funny is that some have been in our crew and now have blinkers on that say that i am against what you are commenting on , i don't and never have, when they were part of this crew they were happy with the state of affairs aiding the collection and NEVER having a say.... but i will leave that there. I am here to No 1 enjoy the game and quite frankly could not care about any No 1 status whatever it maybe, win battles / lose battles that's the way it goes the sun will rise tomorrow, some should take that and heed to it instead of trying to destroy everything that is good about the game, due to historical grudges ITS a game and we should always remember that.
What i do need to add to this is James run's a business that needs to pay its way , and part of his cash cow is players buying CPs , now this is where the problem lies , a major portion of his income is players that purchase real money CPs to have bomb floors on double day many do it not only ALL IN. Does anyone here really think James will stop that? Because frankly if he does double day will be a thing of the past at the level it now is and secondly will we have a game in a couple of years time?
I have never seen a multi million dollar company fire the top earning sales person due to lesser sales persons complaining that they cannot match the top earners income?
We have to all be aware of that if we want this game to still be here for our enjoyment in years to come.
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
We have No BLINKERS on start a new suggestion and we will have comments there , the funny thing is we are with your suggestion that is a given, my suggestion was BATTLE crew ranking points not DOUBLE day crew ranking points. Get it going @babychels and 1arm and i will make my comments there.
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Actually a good point to this suggestion that was brought up by @babychels that i did miss is that if any xps are going to be given to win vs a loss just change the scoring to win = 20k xps to crew ranking and for a loss 10K to crew ranking, drop the 25% and 10% altogether.
That will be a fairer proposition to all crew battles whether 3vs3 or 25vs25 win = 20k xps to crew rank and lose = 10K to crew rank xps.
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
The point of the suggestion is not about changing crew size in battles or having more players vs less players, we are using the 10vs10 battle as the marker for when total scores for a win at 25% is capped to 20k xps to crew ranking and for a loss 10% at 10K towards crew ranking. Most of your crew battles are averaged at 4vs4 so the maximum your crew can earn for a win towards crew ranking is for eg, around 60k where all 4 players got good scores and you will get 25% of that towards crew ranking xps which = 15k . You would need to do 5 battles and win them all to attain the same score as the 25vs25 battle we will use as a guideline.
I hope this is making it clearer
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Purely to have a scoring cap for crew rankings , at a 10vs10 or more battle, nothing changes with crew sizes Chels
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Resize crews? not what we are saying Chels nothing about that, not sure what you are misunderstanding in the suggestion its just battles that are 10vs10 and above everything else remains the same
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
ss the loser attained 10% 23990 towards crew rank
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
A large battle has just completed 25 vs 25 and scores were 314874 win so 25% towards crew ranking = 78529 and the loser gained 239903 that is 10% = 24307 for the losing crew towards crew ranking this where the problem lies as where do the smaller 3-10 members stand and this is the case in point.
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
I do hear all the comments in the thread, but i do think we are moving away from the topic at hand , battle crew ranking scoring, lets stick to that for voting purposes and maybe @Topgunner if you can start a new suggestion for your xp concerns that will be the right avenue to follow and we can have that discussion separate to this.
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
I dont agree with the top 3 scores only as all crew member battlers want to feel a part of the win factor , i do believe the scoring is a fair reflection to include all scores from all players.
I totally agree on the personal rewards and that can be a separate issue for some discussion in another thread.
Demondwarf
shared this idea
·
-
148 votes
The next update will have some tweaks on this front. We’ll continue to monitor and see if any further adjustments are needed.
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Previously there was not another "game" available for the personal challenges , and the spinners were used by James , my opinion now is drop spinners altogether and replace this with a Bingo challenge working along much the same lines as soli , spinners have become a costly affair for the least amount of "fun" trying to get a higher score, are time consuming and basically at times becomes an "out" for when having a bad score look brilliant. There is no skill.
Demondwarf
supported this idea
·
-
73 votesDemondwarf
shared this idea
·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Demondwarf
commented
Brilliant suggestion as it is most frustrating in battles as well for completing challenges
Demondwarf
supported this idea
·
-
81 votesDemondwarf
supported this idea
·
-
93 votesDemondwarf
supported this idea
·
-
1 voteDemondwarf
shared this idea
·
And to add before i close this post that means players like 1 arm cannot read the suggestion above
"We can all do the maths as to how many battles the smaller crews must do and.......... win them all to match the 50k from the larger crew battle."