👍👀👍

I want to vote on this but at the same time it seems biased. I definitely agree that these big battles are an issue but they are not the only issue with this crew ranking system. Experience in the game also earns crew points and is another way players "manipulate" large amounts of points toward crew ranking so how can you say that talking about that is off topic?? If we don't discuss ALL of the issues with the crew ranking formula he will only fix half of the problem and it will still be messed up. The bottom line is crew ranking has never been set up so that it is fair to all crews. It has always given certain teams an advantage. Crews in this game are very different. Not only do they range in size from 3-100 but some crews have been around for years with hundreds of battles under their belts while others are just starting out. Some people have mentioned categorizing crews to make ranking fair but the thing is, the game really isn't big enough for that. What I think he needs to do is simplify it and stop trying to include so many factors into crew rank. The most important aspect of ranking should be that it is fair. All crews should have the same chance at competing in it regardless of if that crew is big, small new or old. This system is no better than any of his other systems its just easier to understand but it's far from fair. It clearly favors the larger crews. Realistically 3 people should not be expected to have to compete with what 100 people can earn as far as experience. Same as 3 peoples battles scores cant compete with 25 peoples battles scores. He needs to base ranking on the win/loss records alone and not on scores or xp. Then it would be fair for all crews regardless of size. I think he should completely change it. In sports or any competing event you dont get scores from when you first started playing. There is new seasons. Why? So that everyone can compete. I think crews should have to battle to rank and we should have crew ranking reset every month and base it only on each crews win/loss records during that month then reset it so it starts over every month. This would allow new crews to compete and it would also make it so these dead crews (where people left the game years ago) don't outrank current active battling crews. There are several dead crews near the top still with no active players even left in them but because they battled alot years ago when it wasnt even the same battling system they are up high in rank ahead of active players!?!. That just isn't right either.

As long as xp's are not included with crews. Just because your with all in crew, cb and snooky alone gained almost 100 million last dbl day it gave y'all over 400k crew score. All xp's should go to your personal xps. If this don't happen then it will be unfair to every crew here!

Actually a good point to this suggestion that was brought up by @babychels that i did miss is that if any xps are going to be given to win vs a loss just change the scoring to win = 20k xps to crew ranking and for a loss 10K to crew ranking, drop the 25% and 10% altogether.

That will be a fairer proposition to all crew battles whether 3vs3 or 25vs25 win = 20k xps to crew rank and lose = 10K to crew rank xps.

The point of the suggestion is not about changing crew size in battles or having more players vs less players, we are using the 10vs10 battle as the marker for when total scores for a win at 25% is capped to 20k xps to crew ranking and for a loss 10% at 10K towards crew ranking. Most of your crew battles are averaged at 4vs4 so the maximum your crew can earn for a win towards crew ranking is for eg, around 60k where all 4 players got good scores and you will get 25% of that towards crew ranking xps which = 15k . You would need to do 5 battles and win them all to attain the same score as the 25vs25 battle we will use as a guideline.

I hope this is making it clearer

By taking it back to the way it use to be , your only fixing part of the problem. I get 10v10 or 5 v 10 only 5 of those 10 would count. Just the way it use to be. But now you have xps counting for score also. How can you over look that ?

Purely to have a scoring cap for crew rankings , at a 10vs10 or more battle, nothing changes with crew sizes Chels

10V10 if I'm not mistaking again you are saying 10 people battle 10 people ?

Resize crews? not what we are saying Chels nothing about that, not sure what you are misunderstanding in the suggestion its just battles that are 10vs10 and above everything else remains the same

I disagree with 10 V 10. Most crews does not have 10 people to battle. Crews originally 3 minimum. We should not have to resize our crews. You want us to upgrade well there is also downgrading. Again crews should be categorized. This would be a solution to all problems. Once the crews are placed in each category then you would only battle/war those in your category. You could upgrade or downgraded your crew to move into another category. There should be no more than 5 members difference for each category.

ss the loser attained 10% 23990 towards crew rank

A large battle has just completed 25 vs 25 and scores were 314874 win so 25% towards crew ranking = 78529 and the loser gained 239903 that is 10% = 24307 for the losing crew towards crew ranking this where the problem lies as where do the smaller 3-10 members stand and this is the case in point.

I agree with the others :)

I do hear all the comments in the thread, but i do think we are moving away from the topic at hand , battle crew ranking scoring, lets stick to that for voting purposes and maybe @Topgunner if you can start a new suggestion for your xp concerns that will be the right avenue to follow and we can have that discussion separate to this.

I agree, it would be more fair if smaller crews could gain experience as fast as bigger ones. crew xp should also not depend on how many bombs you can throw for double day

Thank you for doing this feedback. There is definitely an issue. I would rather see the xps done away with in crews. Crews need to battle/war for level/score. With how crazy dbl day is it's not fair to have the xps also going to crews. Should only go for their personal xps.

I dont agree with the top 3 scores only as all crew member battlers want to feel a part of the win factor , i do believe the scoring is a fair reflection to include all scores from all players.

I totally agree on the personal rewards and that can be a separate issue for some discussion in another thread.

I agree, maybe the crew that wins accumulates the points only from the 3 highest scorers for the wining crew (35k to 50k). Then losing crew gets 50% of their highest 3 scorers (15k-20k)??

[ Whilst we discussing battles, please consider and increase the personal XP earned as well for battle, to provide more reward and incentive to players (Buying 1 drink at bar does not equal 24hours effort of battle time) ]

-TOPGUNNER