As it is now this game doesn't have enough crews that like battling. We always battle the same few crews. lf your idea would be implemented it would mean the smaller crews that like to battle have to fuse together or they can't battle. lf you are forcing the few crews that battle to fuse together we end up with even less crews that battle.
l would like to see more crews that battle so we don't get the same battle over and over again so making the small crews fuse together is the opposite that needs to happen. What needs to happen is the big crew splitting up so we all have a bit of variety of taste when it comes to battle.
l see some comments from crews that have members being disappointed cause they can't get a battle, just split up!
l think we will all be happy when their are more then just a few battling crews

I'm sorry but I don't agree. how about the crews with less members? shouldn't they have the right to battle too?

I am against this idea too, there has been a lot of this talk before about crew sizes and James has sorted it perfectly now where people can take part if they wish and sometimes that means the minimum 3 people are available. I would hate to see it go back to people being forced to battle as and when the crew wants to battle as that kind of forced me out of battling all together! It is tough to keep up with battling especially if you want to be in the top scoring side. The way it is set now seems to be very fair and really liked the war last time too. Now with the bomb scoring being equal between citizens and non citizens it has become much fairer. Battles are mostly all luck based once you know how to battle anyway, right?

Great idea! I agree increase the number to five V five.

While they're at it, maybe they could increase the player base to support larger crews, rethink battles from a fresh perspective one of "fun" instead of attrition so people want to actually participate in them, eliminate the nonsense crew scores all together to simply go on win/loss ratio, toss out levels and go off bankroll more cash higher bets like magic it works for casinos, release a new slot game or two, release a craps game I mean casino hello and make "free" spinners spin faster so I don't have to sit here all day clicking "daily free spin" once every seventeen seconds because they wont get the blasted thing done in ten.

Good stuff, I like where this thread is headed!

I do not agree. The game is for everyone, and the facts that there are so few people here should make it a realization that you keep running folks off with your changes to the rules to accommodate bigger this and that. Make categories to match crew battles 1-5 or less, 2 - 5 to 10, 3 - over 10. I am in a larger crew and we love to battle with as many as possible but we also respect all others who wish to play the game their way. Please do not run off more players, we barely have enough to play as it is.

I am completely against this idea. While it sounds good in theory, it will never work, there are not enough crews that choose to battle now, and for smaller crews to be forced to put 5 in, will further decrease the number of crews willing to do so. If this is implemented, I see battles disappearing completely.

this definitely needs tyo be changed!....need to have minimum of 5 for battle.

Also would like to say we need to limit crew size as well, I think 100 is way to many and not fair to all the other crew's, They can do a battle with both there crews with 60 people in each and gain 50k exp. Where a crew with only like 14 - 18 will have to do a total of 6 battles back to back with no rest, let alone the cost in getting spinners etc to do so. THIS IS NOT FAIR JAMES. I think crews should be limited to like 25 or maybe poss. on the high end to 30 each. So crew sizes in my book should be from 5 to 25. It is wrong to have one guy own two crew's with 100 members each. He can say it's his sister's all he wants we all know the truth. Not hard to figure it out. Just watch when both teams leaders are on and you will always find one hiding somewhere and not doing anything. while one is collecting bombs etc. again not hard to figure it out.

Many Many Times crew's that have 5 or more can not even play half there player's because we get stuck with a 3 person crew. All we hear at the time is I wanted to play or he got to do the last battle and now I have to sit out again. or not enough people on out of 3 players to do the challenges, some like to play the battles where some play at night and the others at day, so half the time in for half the group. So there for there will not be enough on to do the TC's such as jobs, sprints, missions, or even get the poker scores without having to ask outsider's to come help us as we have done in the past. No one wants to ask someone from another crew to sit on our poker table and fold or 2 hours to get a score. If the three player teams can't figure this out then it's there loss, not to mention the odd's are just better with 5 people than 3. So if 3 people are having an off day or the slots and games are so freaking tight you can't hit anything, then with a 5 player team you have two more people to maybe get lucky and hit something big. Oh and yes, I thought it was in the rules not to call people or teams cheater's. Why is he allowed to send pm's like that James. Something needs to be done when there is written proof.

This a great Idea, any number lower then 3 really is not worth doing in my book. It would be better if 5 or more. Thanks

youre right about one thing... a whole lot of people SAID they supported this idea, that havent said a word, or even voted. ~J2G~

youre ignoring an awful lot while making YOUR points, lolol

What is the odds based game. Do you hear yourself think before you type? Your trying to get your point across for players to vote here other then the 25 players in your crew voting 3 times each for this. you may get more if make your point a lot clearer.

*shouldnt

If you need that part explained you should be playing an odds based game, lmao

"I" I dont want nothing other then you to make sense.because by the sound of it you have no clue what you want other then just to make up reason why you all keep on losing your battles.
Stiil waiting to hear what is the difference from 3v3 and 5v5

And from the sounds of it now you want this based on what two small crews want, over the population. Your words, not mine. "the same crew would be battling each other all the time and that would get old quick. " ~J2G~

Yes us wanting to battle the top 5 crews, with as many members possible is exactly that.... lolololol ~J2G~

Well your great solution would mean that the same crew would be battling each other all the time and that would get old quick. but i get it know you just want to battle crews that you believe you can beat over and over again. The easy way out !!!

"please do tell" why small crews vs small crews, and large crew vs large crews isnt a good solution? ~J2G~