Personally I think this is a great idea. Regarding the review team it should be picked at random loto system and be players of a certain level. No relation / friendship to the CA or player with issue. We have a similar system at my work. When a employee has a write up they do not agree with, There is a panel chosen and other employees review the case for determination if bulling is happening or if the disciplinary action is valid. If bulling is found to be the case then disciplinary action is taken against the lead / supervisor in the case of this game the CA. Yes it takes time and the reviewers need to be compensated. This has saved my work countless law suits and money since being instated. It could save this game money, lost players, and bad reviews.
DONBIGD
Personally I think this is a great idea. Regarding the review team it should be picked at random loto system and be players of a certain level. No relation / friendship to the CA or player with issue. We have a similar system at my work. When a employee has a write up they do not agree with, There is a panel chosen and other employees review the case for determination if bulling is happening or if the disciplinary action is valid. If bulling is found to be the case then disciplinary action is taken against the lead / supervisor in the case of this game the CA. Yes it takes time and the reviewers need to be compensated. This has saved my work countless law suits and money since being instated. It could save this game money, lost players, and bad reviews.