battle protection
For a crew to buy battle protection and others cant find a crew to battle with is wrong. I believe that the only way to get battle protection is to earning it by been in a battle.This makes if fair for those crews that enjoy a good auld battle while other hide behind this battle protection and all we have is inactive crews to battle.
Anonymous
shared this idea
Battle protection was created as a very deliberate option because not everyone wants to battle. A big part of crews it the community aspect, and many people are only in it for that aspect.
-
Bayou Boogie commented
Crews should be allowed to keep battle protection as long as they choose if they do not battle,however of a team that challenges for battle they should be vulnerable for 7 days after attack instead of being allowed to hide behind protection
-
Anonymous
commented
bent has been on little time yet has taking over no one cares what you want
-
Anonymous
commented
it wrong to get bret to want to crew war with little crew not play for long and sypres always talik about he war with people all time why them want to take over casino
-
ChelseaDT
commented
No , Some crews may just want to have the sense of a family in a crew and not battle , not all crews have to be interested in participating in battles all the time.
Some people are well known for wanting to just enjoy the social aspect the game offers rather than competing others. Battle protection should stay
-
Davrock
commented
Agreed crews should not be able to hide behind battle protection for long periods. If you want to hold a top ranking you should have to battle regularly.
-
Sypress
commented
I agree, battle protection can be a pain. I think it being earned is a good idea. I also think if a crew's leaders are all inactive for a certain amount of time, that crew should be labeled as inactive and taken off the battle lists.